Talk:George Lincoln Rockwell
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 25, 2015. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Assassination or murder?
[edit]The lead says that Rockwell was murdered, but he was a public figure and the likely motive was political in nature. Public figures who are murdered for political reasons are commonly called victims of assassination (see MLK and Malcolm X). Is Rockwell's ideology being used against him as a reason to not accurately categorize his death? 47.137.183.192 (talk) 04:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- Nowhere does the article explain how this was politically motivated, nor does it give any motive at all. The John Patler article doesn't either. This information would require reliable sources. Assassination is a subset of murder, so just saying "murder" is sufficient and more neutral until such sources are provided. Grayfell (talk) 02:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed. I've eliminated references to assassination from the article for these reasons. João Do Rio (talk) 21:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
On the entry for "American Nazi Party" Rockwell's killing is called an assassination and the murder an assassin throughout the entry. There isn't a reference given, but the media reported Rockwell's killing as an assassination. I'm not sure which is the right term to use, but there should probably be consistency between this entry and the one on the American Nazi Party? TheBlueTortoise (talk) 07:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Belatedly, I have changed that article, as explained at Talk:American Nazi Party. I agree that this term is not strictly incorrect, but still do not think it adds clarity. The information is better presented in direct, simple language. Grayfell (talk) 01:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Publications
[edit]I ran a Google search for "How Malcolm X Helped Aryans". Doesn't exist. The only results were three identical Wiki entries with basically the same contents of this article. There isn't even a source for this. Which one of you put that there?2600:1700:E710:5D20:30E0:A3AE:F616:6819 (talk) 23:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- It was added by an anonymous vandal. I've removed it. Grayfell (talk) 23:54, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:06, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Assassinated Nazis category
[edit]I had reverted the addition of Category:Assassinated Nazis, but was reverted yesterday with the rationale "Ignore all precedents". I don't believe an essay is a valid reason to edit war over a category that doesn't even seem applicable here, as it seems to be used for people who actually worked for and/or collaborated with the actual Nazi party before or during WWII. Pinging @MagicatthemovieS to discuss. The WordsmithTalk to me 16:39, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- The category is for Nazis, not simply Nazis from the 1940s. I think the category fits here, as Rockwell was a Nazi and he was assassinated. MagicatthemovieS (talk) 17:27, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Rockwell was a neo-Nazi, not an actual Nazi. There's an important difference. If there was a category/subcategory for that it would be appropriate, but it doesn't seem to fit here. The WordsmithTalk to me 13:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
- A neo-Nazi is a Nazi, and Wikipedia says so.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 14:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS
Dubious
[edit]At the end of the "military service" section, GLR's article says that U.S. Lady magazine incorporated his extremist views into its publication. However, this claim fails to provide a source, and furthermore the U.S. Lady article itself directly contradicts that, reading (with a source at the end, to boot): "Rockwell's political views had never been espoused in the magazine during his tenure with U.S. Lady." CitizenKang414 (talk) 03:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in People
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- C-Class vital articles in People
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Virginia articles
- Low-importance Virginia articles
- WikiProject Virginia articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- Start-Class biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- Start-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Start-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- C-Class Discrimination articles
- Unknown-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles
- Selected anniversaries (August 2015)